Description: Polygons Indicating the Urban Area locations for the Timaru District For any further information please contact: - Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDCGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Other District Wide MattersSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Fill: - ?, RGB: - ?.?, ?, Outline width: - 1 pts
Description: Layer showing specific Development Areas Grouping: - Area specific mattersSub Group: - Development AreaSymbol Specifications: - "Polygon", RGB: - 0, 112,225, Outline Width:- 2 pts, Fill:- none
Description: Indicating the different stages within the Development Areas shown in the District Plan - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)For any further information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Layer showing specific Future Development Areas Grouping: - Area specific mattersSub Group: - Future Development AreaSymbol Specifications: - "Polygon", RGB: - 0, 38, 115, Outline Width:- 2.5 pts, Fill:- "to be decided & approved"
Description: Indicating specific locations for Heritage ItemGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Point", RGB: - 132, 0, 168
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai TapuGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai TapuGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai TapuGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai TapuGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai TapuGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai Taoka in the form of Lines.Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polyline", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific National Grid Lines - (Powerlines)Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - InfrustructureSymbology Specifications: - "Line", RGB: - 52, 52, 52, Line width: - 2 ptsThis is commercially sensitive data and is only intended to be only used in house.By using the data in any way you are deemed to have accepted Transpower's terms and conditions (found in The Licensee Power Limited re: Licence for Use of Transmission Network Data 26 October 2004).Previously updated in 2007.National Grid Powerlines. Managed by Transpower--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The datasets Data used for National Grid Lines layer was dowloaded from t he Transpower - open Source Data Website - 14th August 2020https://www.transpower.co.nz/keeping-you-connected/maps-and-gis-data-0https://data-transpower.opendata.arcgis.com/https://data-transpower.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/transmission-lines?showData=true--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transpower Transmission LinesISO-19139 MetadataMetadata Information:Metadata language:Metadata character set: - utf8Last update: -Metadata contact - publisher:Individual's name: - Wayne BirdOrganization's name: - TranspowerContact's position: - Geospatial ManagerContact information:Phone:Voice: +64 4 495 7000Scope of the data described by the metadata: - datasetScope name: - datasetName of the metadata standard used: - ISO 19139 Geographic Information - Metadata - Implementation SpecificationVersion of the metadata standard: - 2007Metadata identifier: - 25D59832-BFED-4E7A-BC00-2B1C8AEA61A1Resource Identification Information:Citation: -Title: - Transpower Transmission LinesReference date - creation: 2002-07-01Themes or categories of the resource: - structure, utilitiesCommunicationDescriptive keywords - :Keywords: -Downloadable DataAbstract:-Transmission Lines is a polyline dataset representing the power lines that are used to transmit electric power across NZ, usually from a power generating station to main substations that make up the National Grid. They are comprised of overhead and underground conducting lines of either copper or aluminium. In NZ these High Voltage (HV) transmission lines operate at kiloVoltages (kV) of 33 , 66, 110, 220 AC and 350 DC. (Transmission Line is not a topological network.) (Spans are a sub-set of the Transmission Lines data set. Spans record the structure from / to and the length between the structures). The Transmission Lines dataset is updated ad-hocly.Dataset language: - engDataset character set: - utf8Resource constraints: -Legal constraints: -Access constraints: - license,Use constraints: -Extent: -Extent: -Geographic extent:Bounding rectangle:West longitude: 0East longitude: 0North latitude: 0South latitude: 0Reference System Information: -Reference system identifier: -Value: - EPSG::2193Distribution Information: -Format:Format name: *.xmlFormat version: Unknown
Description: Specific line indicating Road HierarchyGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - TransportSymbology Specifications: - "Line", Timaru District road network hierarchy.A road hierarchy differentiates between roads by function. Roads at the top of a road hierarchy are generally arterial routes that cater for through traffic and often have high traffic volumes and operate at high speeds. Roads at the lower end of a road hierarchy tend to have a local access function and may have lower volumes or speed environments.Ideally roads should connect into roads at the same level in the road hierarchy or one level above or below them in hierarchy. This promotes network efficiency by ensuring each road performs the function for which it is designed that intersections operate efficiently and that, so far as practiable, through traffic and local traffic and separated and managed to minimise conflict.A number of different road hierarchies are possible and there are no standard versions.This Layer was rolled over from the Previous District Plan layer & was updated in August of 2020 for the District Plan 2020
Description: Specific Line Areas showing Indicative & Proposed Roads for the District PlanGrouping: - Area specific mattersSub Group: - Development AreaSymbology Specifications: - "Polyline", Type: - Cartographic Line Symbol, Font: - ESRI Default Maker, Subset: - Basic Latin , Width: - 6 pts , RGB: - 0, 0, 0
Description: Indicating the "Birdstrike Management Overlay" area shown in the District Plan - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)on the 28th may 2022The Birdstrike Managemant are is located as a 3km Buffer area around the Timaru Airport area outline. ( "Richard Pearce Airport")For any further information please contact: - Megan Geng Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Specific Aerdrome Flight Paths of aircraft entering and exiting the Richard Pearse Airport, Timaru.The flight paths consist of take off and approach corridoes in and out of the North South sealed runway 02-20 and East West grassed runway 11-29 together with a horisontal surface and a conical surface lying over the aerodrome. The purpose of restrictions on the flight paths in and out of the aerodrome is to control other activities in such a way as to ensure the safe and efficient functionion of the Richard Pearse Airport.Richard Pearse Airport Flight Paths was created for the 2003 district plan & has been rolled over to the 2020 District PlanGrouping: - Area specific mattersSub Grouping: - DesignationSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type:- Cartographic Line Symbol, Width:- 2 pts, Line separation: - 5 pts, RGB:- 230, 0, 169, Interval Template of: ., Intervals: - 1 pts
Description: Indicating specific Outstanding Natural Features AreasGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Natural Environment ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Areas indicating the Versatile Soils Grouping: - District Wide MattersSub Group: - Natural Environment ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon"
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: Landcare Research New Zealand Limited
The User shall: Acknowledge the source of the Data on all material in which the Data is used (whether in whole or in part, including in all derivative works) by including the following statement on material in which the Data is used (whether electronic or otherwise): "Data reproduced with the permission of Landcare Research New Zealand Limited"
Description: Coastal Marine Area boundary and the landward boundaries of Hazard Zones 1 and 2 within the Canterbury Region as shown in the Canterbury Regional Coastal Environment Plan 2005. The Coastal Marine Area Boundary (CMA) along the line of Mean High Water Springs (MHWS) is indicative only. Environment Canterbury has defined Hazard Zones along the Region’s coast. Two zones are defined: Hazard Zone 1 - This is a zone delimited by a line approximately parallel with the shoreline, set inland from mean high water mark springs, which contains the current active beach system and land that is at risk from coastal erosion within 50 years of this Plan being produced. Hazard Zone 2 - This is inland from Hazard Zone 1, and marks land that is at risk from coastal erosion in the period 50 to 100 years of this Plan being produced. Coastal Erosion features as shown in Volume 3 and Chapter 9 of the Regional Coastal Environment Plan (RCEP) and in Appendix 5 of the Canterbury Regional Policy Statement (RPS). For further information please visit http://ecan.govt.nz/publications/Pages/regional-coastal-environment-plan.aspx and http://ecan.govt.nz/our-responsibilities/regional-plans/rps/pages/default.aspx Downloaded on 31/01/2017 from ECAN website.
Description: Polygons indicating the Proposed River Protection Areas for the Proposed District Plan showing the section of each relevant river demarkated. This layer is part of the Natural Environment layers.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: Data supplied by Loren Brown, TDC Planning Unit.
Description: Layer Description: - Salmon Spawning Sites (Plan Change 7)Group: - District Wide MattersSub Group: - Activities on the Surface of WaterLayer Name: - pLWRP_Plan_Change_7Layer was shared by: - Canterbury Maps through their Open Data siteSource: - gis.ecan.govt.nzSource URL: - https://gis.ecan.govt.nz/arcgis/rest/services/Public/pLWRP_Plan_Change_7/MapServer/2This layer was Created: - 30th July 2019This Layer was Updated: - 16th August 2019Terms of Use: - No special restrictions or limitations on using the item’s content was provided.
Description: Indcating areas of protection for the Long-tailed Bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) communites roosting habitat - Was Created for the TDC District Plan 2020 For any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific the Coastal High Natural CharacterGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Coastal EnvironmentSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon"Layers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating specific Outstanding Natural Landscape AreasGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Natural Environment ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: - Line Fill Symbol, Angle: - 45, Line width: - 0.5 pts, Line separation: - 1.7639 pts, Outline & Line RGB - 255, 127, 127, Outline width: - 2 ptsLayers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Signicifant natural areas are defined as areas where natural and physical resources need protection due to significant indigenous vegetation and habitats of indigenous faunathat are located within that designated area.This layer depicts areas identified during Mike Harding's study of Significant Natural Areas. The study is broken up into sepearte reports for each parcel involved and are available in TRIM/RM8. The survey was undertaken over an eleven-year period between 2005 and 2016.The Timaru District Council identified SNAs during preparation of the Timaru District Plan (2005). These SNAs were selected from published reports, aerial photographs and local knowledge. At completion of the survey in 2016, 772 SNAs covering a total area of 7260 hectares had been surveyed and mapped. More than 200 properties were assessed during the survey, including small lifestyle blocks, roadsides, low country farms, large hill country farms and high country stations. Nearly all (95%) of the properties were assessed by field survey. Ten other properties were assessed by desk-top analysis of available information, in consultation with the landownersAn overview of the study is available in TRIM/RM8 record number 1025958.Fields Include:Description - RM8 document number which will contain further information about the Significant Natural AreaRef Number - RM8 document reference numberPerimeter - Hectares - Area in hectaresProperty - Property OwnerSNA-Ref - Significant Natural Area reference number
Description: Indicating specific Visual Amenity Landscape AreasGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Natural Environment ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: line: - Fill Symbol, Angle: - 10, Line width: - 1 pts, Line separation: - 1.7639 pts, Outline & Line RGB - 130, 130, 130, Outline width: - 2 ptsLayers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: Indicating the specific location of Notable TreesGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Historical and Cultural ValuesSymbology Specifications: - "Point", RGB: - RGB: 38, 115, 0
Description: Indicating areas within 250m from the Major Hazard Facilities in the Timaru District - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)For any further information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: A polygon indicating the Coastal High Hazard (Erosion) Area.Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Coastal EnvironmentSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: - marker, Line Symbol Font: - ESRI Default Maker, Subset: - Basic Latin, Width: - ? pts, RGB: - ?, ?, ?, Interval Template of: - , Intervals: - ? ptsThe Shapefile was provided by: - Ecan in which it was decided that the - "1.2 2120 P50 Erosion Senario - P50" would be used.For further information: - Please do not hesitate to contact: - Megan Geng or Mark Geddes from the planning department at TDC
Description: A polygon indicating a 100 Year Coastal High Hazard (Inundation) Area.Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Coastal EnvironmentSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: - marker, Line Symbol Font: - ESRI Default Maker, Subset: - Basic Latin, Width: - ? pts, RGB: - ?, ?, ?, Interval Template of: - , Intervals: - ? ptsThe Shapefile was provided by: - Ecan in which it was decided that the - "100 Year Inundation Contour - 1.2" would be used.For further information: - please do not hesitate to contact: - Megan Geng or Mark Geddes from the planning department at TDC
Description: Indicating the specificFlooding Assessment Area for the district plan.Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Hazards & RisksSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: - Line Fill Symbol, Line - RGB: - 0, 92, 230, Two Angle's: 135 & 45, Seperation: - 2.1167, Width: - 0.50, Outline - RGB: 255, 0 ,0, Outline Width: - 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Flood Assessment Area was created from the already used (TDC) Flood Hazards Layer in the District as per various ECAN (CRC) Management Plans and Studies.Digitized by the Timaru District Council from Orari-Waihi-Temuka Flood Plain Management Plan produced by Ecan in 1993. Report 93 (12) May 1993. ISBN 1-86937-218-2Washdyke & Taitarakihi Creek Flood Plain Management produced by Ecan in 1988. Publication No. 59. ISSN 0111-7335.Temuka Borough Flood Plain Management produced by Ecan in 1989. SCCB Publication No. 63. ISSN 0111-7335.Butlers Road & Stratheona Huts Flood Plain Management Plan produced by Ecan. Publication No R91/20.Pleasant Point Flood Plain Management Plan produced by Ecan. Publication No R90/17.Levels Plain Flood Plain Management Plan produced by Ecan in 1992. Publication No. R92/7. ISBN 1-86937-159-3.Draft Pareora River Flood Plain Management Strategy produced by Econ in 2003. Report No. R03/6. ISBN 1-86937-480-0.For more information please refer to the publications listed above.
Name: Earthquake Fault (Infrastructure or Facilities Awareness) Areas
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Overlay indicating specific Earthquake Fault Infrastructures or Facilities Awareness, and was supplied for the purpose of the 2020 District PlanGrouping: - District Wide MatterSub Group: - Natural HazardLayer Shape file provided by: - Helen Jack, Senior Scientist, at Environment Canterbury - ECANDate that the Layer was provided: - 22nd of May 2020--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metadata Description from the E-can - Suggested_Timaru_fault_hazard_important_infrastructure_or_facilities_overlay Shapefile: - Suggested fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities)overlay for the TimaruDistrict Plan, May 2020.The suggested Timarufault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay comprises all fault awareness areasin Timaru from the Canterbury fault awareness areas2019 dataset, as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. See this report, and the metadata for the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset,for more detail on how the fault awareness areas were created.The fault awareness areas show areas where there may be a surface fault rupture hazard. Surface fault rupture is the permanent breaking, ripping, buckling or warping of the ground on or near the line where a fault meets the ground surface, as a result of movement on the fault. It is different from earthquake shaking.The suggested Timarufault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay is where the fault rupture hazard should be specifically considered and the fault rupture deformation areas mapped as part of a consent for important or critical infrastructure or facilities (as defined in the TimaruDistrict Plan).Descriptions of the attribute fields:Name: Fault name, taken from the district fault name field (e.g. TDC_name) in the district fault datasets. Some of these have been changed from the original district fault names to make them consistent with what is given in the district fault report.Zone:Fault zone that the fault is within, if any.Certainty:The level of confidence that the mapped feature is in fact an active earthquake fault - definite, likely or possible. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Surface form:How clearly the mapped feature can be seen at the ground surface - well expressed, moderately expressed, not expressed or unknown. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Min RI:Minimum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Max RI:Maximum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Min RI Class:Minimum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al, 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Some values have been changed to better match the minimum fault recurrene interval.Max RI Class:Maximum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Type:Whether the mapped feature is a fault (fault reaches the ground surface) or a monocline (fault stops below the ground surface but forms a fold in the ground surface).Buffer m:Whether a 125m or 250m buffer has been applied to the fault to create the fault awareness area as per Barrell, et al, 2015.Other technical fields, such accuracy, sense of movement, dip direction, down quadrant, trendandfacing, as well as territorial authority (all Timaru) have been removed for simplicity but this information can be found in the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, May 2020, based on the Canterbury Fault Awareness Area 2019 dataset.
Name: Earthquake Fault (Subdivision Awareness) Areas
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: Overlay indicating specific Earthquake Fault Subdividion Awareness, and was supplied for the purpose of the 2020 District PlanGrouping: - District Wide MatterSub Group: - Natural HazardLayer Shape file provided by: - Helen Jack, Senior Scientist, at Environment Canterbury - ECANDate that the Layer was provided: - 22nd of May 2020----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metadata Description from the E-can - Suggested fault hazard (subdivision) overlay for the Timaru District Plan, May 2020.The suggested Timaru fault hazard (subdivision) overlay comprises all definite (well-expressed and moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed and moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas from the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset, as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. It also includes small lengths of definite (not expressed) and likely (not expressed) fault awareness area where they link two definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) or likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas, because the fault rupture hazard should still be considered in these areas during subdivision.These small lengths of definite (not expressed) and likely (not expressed) fault awareness area have had their width reduced to be the same as the definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas on either side (total width 250 metres) as it is unlikely that the actual location of the fault trace deviates from the adjacent definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas. See Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211and the metadata for the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset for more detail on how the fault awareness areas were delineated.The fault awareness areas show areas where there may be a surface fault rupture hazard. Surface fault rupture is the permanent breaking, ripping, buckling or warping of the ground on or near the line where a fault meets the ground surface, as a result of movement on the fault. It is different from earthquake shaking.The suggested Timaru fault hazard (subdivision) overlay is where the fault rupture hazard should be specifically considered and the fault rupture deformation areas mapped as part of a subdivision consent.Descriptions of the attribute fields:Name: Fault name, taken from the district fault name field (e.g. TDC_name) in the district fault datasets. Some of these have been changed from the original district fault names to make them consistent with what is given in the district fault report.Zone: Fault zone that the fault is within, if any.Certainty: The level of confidence that the mapped feature is in fact an active earthquake fault - definite, likely or possible. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Surface form: How clearly the mapped feature can be seen at the ground surface - well expressed, moderately expressed, not expressed or unknown. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.Min RI: Minimum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Max RI: Maximum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.Min RI: Class:Minimum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al, 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Some values have been changed to better match the minimum fault recurrene interval.Max Ri: Class:Maximum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Type: Whether the mapped feature is a fault (fault reaches the ground surface) or a monocline (fault stops below the ground surface but forms a fold in the ground surface).Other technical fields, such accuracy, sense of movement, dip direction, down quadrant, trendandfacing, as well as territorial authority (all Timaru) and buffer distance(all 125 metres) have been removed for simplicity but this information can be found in the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, May 2020, based on the Canterbury Fault Awareness Area 2019 dataset.
Description: Overlay indicating draft liquefaction susceptibility areas, and was supplied for the purpose of the 2020 District PlanLayer Shape file provided by: - Environment Canterbury - ECANDate that the Layer was provided: - 29th of June 2020-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metadata Description from the E-can -This dataset provides liquefaction susceptibility areas for Timaru district. The susceptibility areas are based on the areas given in McCahon, 2013, Liquefaction Hazard in Timaru District (Environment Canterbury report R13/29), which were mainly based on 1:250,000 geological map units, with some groundwater and test pit information in urban areas.The boundaries of the susceptibility areas have been modified using 1:50,000 topographic maps and lidar where available (Timaru township area and the Canterbury Plains), and are accurate to 1:50,000 for most of the district and approximately 1:10,000 in Timaru township. In some areas, new polygons have been added to delineate Holocene or Pleistocene sediment as per the 1:250,000 geological map units, where these were previously shown as rock or hill soils in the 2013 dataset. This includes areas along Taitarakihi Creek and the heads of Waimataitai Valley and Saltwater Creek in Timaru township.The susceptibility areas have been renamed from the 2013 names to be consistent with Table 1.1 of the 2017 Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment guidance Planning and engineering guidance for potentially liquefaction-prone land. Fields have also been added providing suggested levels of geotechnical liquefaction investigations that should be undertaken in each area for different activities (subdivision, important infrastructure, and building consents) to determine the liquefaction hazard and appropriate mitigation measures, if required. These are also based on the 2017 MBIE guidance (Tables 3.6 and 3.7).This dataset has been reviewed by Ian McCahon, author of the 2013 liquefaction report.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: Dataset created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury - June 2020.
Description: Indicating specific Coastal Environment AreasGrouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - Coastal EnvironmentSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Angle: - 90.00, Line width: - 1 pts, Line separation: - 80 pts, RGB - 28, 103, 148, Outline width: - 2 ptsLayers were Created / Supplied by: - Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .website: - www.boffamiskell.co.nz. for any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC
Description: To assist in the evaluation of potential future Esplanade Strips and ReservesAn esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken for one or more of the purposes of s229 of the RMA, including protection of conservation values, provision of public access, or provision of recreational use (that is compatible with the conservation values) when privately owned land is subdivided.The taking of an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip when land is subdivided is restricted to allotments which abut the coast, lakes or rivers.Where an allotment of less than 4 hectares is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve of 20 metres width will be set aside where the lot adjoins the coast, rivers whose bed width is an average of 3 metres or more, or lakes whose bed is 8 hectares or more in area.However, under s77 of the RMA, a rule in a district plan can alter this presumption so that either no reserve is required, or the width of the reserve is to be greater or less than 20 metres, or an esplanade strip is required instead.Where an allotment of 4 hectares or greater is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve will not be taken on the allotment. Similarly this presumption can be altered under s77 of the RMA by a rule in a district plan that specifies the circumstances in which an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken. In this case there is no minimum size of the water body to which the requirements apply.
Description: To assist in the evaluation of potential future Esplanade Strips and ReservesAn esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken for one or more of the purposes of s229 of the RMA, including protection of conservation values, provision of public access, or provision of recreational use (that is compatible with the conservation values) when privately owned land is subdivided.The taking of an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip when land is subdivided is restricted to allotments which abut the coast, lakes or rivers.Where an allotment of less than 4 hectares is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve of 20 metres width will be set aside where the lot adjoins the coast, rivers whose bed width is an average of 3 metres or more, or lakes whose bed is 8 hectares or more in area.However, under s77 of the RMA, a rule in a district plan can alter this presumption so that either no reserve is required, or the width of the reserve is to be greater or less than 20 metres, or an esplanade strip is required instead.Where an allotment of 4 hectares or greater is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve will not be taken on the allotment. Similarly this presumption can be altered under s77 of the RMA by a rule in a district plan that specifies the circumstances in which an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken. In this case there is no minimum size of the water body to which the requirements apply.
Description: OpenDataShared By: canterburymapsData Source: - gis.ecan.govt.nzDescription: - Provisional protection zones for Community and Group drinking water sources have been delineated in accordance with Schedule 1 of the proposed Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan and are based on the best available information as at May 2015. Environment Canterbury has reviewed information on the location of Community and Group drinking water sources in association with Water Suppliers, Territorial Authorities and Community and Public HealthURL: - https://gis.ecan.govt.nz/arcgis/rest/services/Public/Resource_Consents/MapServer/26Feature Layer by: - ECan - canterburymapsCreated: - 1 Sep 2016 Updated: - 27 Mar 2017----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Group: - General District-wide ChaptersSymbol Specifications: - "Polygon", RGB: - ?, ?, ?, Outline Width:- 2 pts, Fill:- ?
Description: Displays Noise Control Boundary for District Planning Maps around Richard Pearse Airport and Levels International Raceway.Grouping: - District Wide mattersSub Grouping: - NoiseSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Angle: - 45.00, Line width: - 1 pts, Line separation: - 5 pts, RGB: - 245, 130, 33, Outline width: - 2 pts
Description: Road Centreline - Layer 818: NZ Road Centre line (Electoral) & Table 2024: Road NameA linear geometry in this layer will consist of the individual road section geometries (as opposed to the NZ Roads (Addressing) layer where these have been aggregated). This layer has been simplified from LINZ’s NZ Roads database, a centralised database for the management of national road data. The comprehensive set of NZ Roads tables is also available.This layer contains the core attributes of a road section to support simple searching with locality and territorial authority or provide a road name context for cadastral data views.This dataset is updated monthyly.
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Land Parcels - Layer 772: NZ Primary ParcelsThis layer provides the current primary parcel polygons and some associated descriptive data that details the appellation (legal description), purpose, size and a list of titles that have an interest in the parcel.A primary parcel is a portion of land that is intended to be :• owned by the Crown, except moveable marginal strips• Held in fee simple ((predominately private ownership)• Maori freehold land or Maori customary land• Public foreshore and seabed• The bed of a lake or river• Road or Railway• Vested in a local authorityPrimary parcels can be thought of as the 'base level' of the 'jigsaw puzzle' of all land making up New Zealand. The dataset is updated monthly.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: LINZ - Land Information New Zealand
Description: Land Parcels - Layer 772: NZ Primary ParcelsThis layer provides the current primary parcel polygons and some associated descriptive data that details the appellation (legal description), purpose, size and a list of titles that have an interest in the parcel.A primary parcel is a portion of land that is intended to be :• owned by the Crown, except moveable marginal strips• Held in fee simple ((predominately private ownership)• Maori freehold land or Maori customary land• Public foreshore and seabed• The bed of a lake or river• Road or Railway• Vested in a local authorityPrimary parcels can be thought of as the 'base level' of the 'jigsaw puzzle' of all land making up New Zealand. The dataset is updated monthly.
Service Item Id: 428049b74d6741c4812bcf4ba384ddc9
Copyright Text: LINZ - Land Information New Zealand
Description: Indicating specific Zone AreasGrouping: - Area specific mattersSub Group: - ZoneSymbology Specifications: - "Polygon", Type: - Fill Symbol, - RGB: - 245, 245, 122, Outline - RGB: 110,110,110, Outline Width: - 0.7Layers were Checked by: - Dean Chrystal - from consultant Planner (Director). E-mail: - [email protected], Website: - planzconsultants.co.nzFor any furhter information please contact: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC