Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P STYLE="margin:0 0 0 0;"><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN>Specific </SPAN><SPAN>C</SPAN><SPAN>ontrols</SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN>- </SPAN><SPAN>spatially identify where a site or area has provisions that are different from other spatial layers that apply to that site or area.</SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN>These tend to apply to smaller, localised and more easily defined sites, such as a single property, rather than wider area with more complexed provisions which may be more appropriately managed using an overlay or precinct.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating the different stages within the Development Areas shown in the District Plan - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">For any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific "Sites and Areas of Significance to Maori"</SPAN><SPAN> through out the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific "Sites and Areas of Significance to Maori"</SPAN><SPAN> through out the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific "Sites and Areas of Significance to Maori"</SPAN><SPAN> through out the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific "Sites and Areas of Significance to Maori"</SPAN><SPAN> through out the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific "Sites and Areas of Significance to Maori"</SPAN><SPAN> through out the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating specific </SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN>Sites & Areas of Significance to Maori - Wai Taoka</SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN> in the form of Lines</SPAN><SPAN> within the Timaru District.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide matters</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Grouping</SPAN><SPAN>: - Historical and Cultural Values</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Symbology Specifications: </SPAN><SPAN>- "Polygon", </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">Layers were Created / Supplied by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Brian McAuslan from Boffa Miskell - [email protected], . .</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">website</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: </SPAN><SPAN>- www.boffamiskell.co.nz. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">F</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">or any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating the "</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">Bird</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">s</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">trike Management Overlay</SPAN><SPAN>" area shown in the District Plan - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)</SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN>on the 28th </SPAN><SPAN>M</SPAN><SPAN>ay 2022</SPAN><SPAN>.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The </SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN>Bird</SPAN><SPAN>s</SPAN><SPAN>trike Management</SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN> are</SPAN><SPAN>a</SPAN><SPAN> is located as a 3km Buffer area around the Timaru Airport area outline. </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">("Richard Pearce Airport")</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">For any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: </SPAN><SPAN>- </SPAN><SPAN>Megan Geng Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicates the locations of "High Naturalness Water Bodies" Within the Timaru District.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating areas within 250m from the </SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN>Major Hazard Facilities</SPAN><SPAN>"</SPAN><SPAN> in the Timaru District - Was Created for the TDC District Plan (2022)</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">For any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Stopbanks </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">(Flood Protection and Drainage Bylaw 2013 - amended 2019)</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The Flood Protection and Drainage Bylaw was made operative on 2 April 2013 and provides for the ongoing management and effective operation of flood protection and drainage works that are owned or controlled by Environment Canterbury. These include drainage schemes, flood protection schemes, floodway's and areas of flood protection vegetation constructed and maintained to prevent damage, danger, or distress to the community from river flood or poor drainage. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN>People undertaking activities within the vicinity of these flood protection or drainage works will require an Authority from Environment Canterbury where the activity could impact on the integrity or efficient operation of the works. There is currently no fee for applying for an Authority and further information can be found here: www.ecan.govt.nz/flood</SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN><SPAN>bylaw</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: f151f2621d7a4f7795c401f40a00475d
Copyright Text: Downloaded from: - ECan's Open Data Website September 2020
Name: Earthquake Fault (Infrastructure or Facilities) Awareness Areas
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Overlay indicating specific Earthquake Fault Infrastructures or Facilities Awareness, and was supplied for the purpose of the 2020 District Plan</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">Metadata Description from the E-can</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;"> - </SPAN><SPAN>Suggested_Timaru_fault_hazard_important_infrastructure_or_facilities_overlay Shapefile: - </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Suggested fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities)overlay for the Timaru</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">District Plan, May 2020.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The suggested Timaru</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay comprises all fault awareness areas</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">in Timaru from the Canterbury fault awareness areas2019 dataset, as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. See this report, and the metadata for the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset,for more detail on how the fault awareness areas were created.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The fault awareness areas show areas where there may be a surface fault rupture hazard. Surface fault rupture is the permanent breaking, ripping, buckling or warping of the ground on or near the line where a fault meets the ground surface, as a result of movement on the fault. It is different from earthquake shaking.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The suggested Timaru</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">fault hazard (important infrastructure or facilities) overlay is where the fault rupture hazard should be specifically considered and the fault rupture deformation areas mapped as part of a consent for important or critical infrastructure or facilities (as defined in the Timaru</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">District Plan).</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">Descriptions of the attribute fields</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Name: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Fault name, taken from the district fault name field (e.g. TDC_name) in the district fault datasets. Some of these have been changed from the original district fault names to make them consistent with what is given in the district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Zone:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Fault zone that the fault is within, if any.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Certainty:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The level of confidence that the mapped feature is in fact an active earthquake fault - definite, likely or possible. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Surface form:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">How clearly the mapped feature can be seen at the ground surface - well expressed, moderately expressed, not expressed or unknown. See </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">"</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Barrell, et al, 201</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">"-</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> for full descriptions.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Min RI:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Minimum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Max RI:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Maximum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Min RI Class:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Minimum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al, 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Some values have been changed to better match the minimum fault recurrence interval.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Max RI Class:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Maximum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Type:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Whether the mapped feature is a fault (fault reaches the ground surface) or a monocline (fault stops below the ground surface but forms a fold in the ground surface).</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Buffer m:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Whether a 125m or 250m buffer has been applied to the fault to create the fault awareness area as per Barrell, et al, 2015.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Other technical field</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">: - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">such accuracy, sense of movement, dip direction, down quadrant, trend</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">and</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">facing, as well as territorial authority (all Timaru) have been removed for simplicity but this information can be found in the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide Matter</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Group: - </SPAN><SPAN>Natural Hazard</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Layer Shape file provided by: - </SPAN><SPAN>Helen Jack, Senior Scientist, at Environment Canterbury - ECAN</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Date that the Layer was provided: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">22nd of May 2020</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: f151f2621d7a4f7795c401f40a00475d
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, May 2020, - based on the Canterbury Fault Awareness Area 2019 dataset.
Name: Earthquake Fault (Subdivision) Awareness Areas
Display Field: NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Overlay indicating specific Earthquake Fault Subdivision Awareness, and was supplied for the purpose of the 2020 District Plan</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">Metadata Description from the E-can </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Suggested fault hazard (subdivision) overlay for the Timaru District Plan, May 2020.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The suggested Timaru fault hazard (subdivision) overlay comprises all definite (well-expressed and moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed and moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas from the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset, as recommended in Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211. It also includes small lengths of definite (not expressed) and likely (not expressed) fault awareness area where they link two definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) or likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas, because the fault rupture hazard should still be considered in these areas during subdivision.</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">These small lengths of definite (not expressed) and likely (not expressed) fault awareness area have had their width reduced to be the same as the definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas on either side (total width 250 metres) as it is unlikely that the actual location of the fault trace deviates from the adjacent definite (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) and likely (well-expressed or moderately-expressed) fault awareness areas. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">See Barrell, et al, 2015, Guidelines for using regional-scale earthquake fault information in Canterbury. GNS Science Consultancy Report 2014/211and the metadata for the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset for more detail on how the fault awareness areas were delineated.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The fault awareness areas show areas where there may be a surface fault rupture hazard. Surface fault rupture is the permanent breaking, ripping, buckling or warping of the ground on or near the line where a fault meets the ground surface, as a result of movement on the fault. It is different from earthquake shaking.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The suggested Timaru fault hazard (subdivision) overlay is where the fault rupture hazard should be specifically considered and the fault rupture deformation areas mapped as part of a subdivision consent.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;text-decoration:underline;">Descriptions of the attribute fields</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">:</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Name: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Fault name, taken from the district fault name field (e.g. TDC_name) in the district fault datasets. Some of these have been changed from the original district fault names to make them consistent with what is given in the district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Zone:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> - </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Fault zone that the fault is within, if any.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Certainty: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">The level of confidence that the mapped feature is in fact an active earthquake fault - definite, likely or possible. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Surface form: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">How clearly the mapped feature can be seen at the ground surface - well expressed, moderately expressed, not expressed or unknown. See Barrell, et al, 2015 for full descriptions.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Min RI: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Minimum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Max RI: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Maximum fault recurrence interval, taken from the summary table of each district fault report.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Min RI</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">.</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> Class:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Minimum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al, 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. Some values have been changed to better match the minimum fault recurrence interval.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Max </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">RI.</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> Class:</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Maximum fault recurrence interval class (as defined in Kerr, et al 2003, Guidelines for development of land on or close to active faults), taken from the summary table of each district fault report. </SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Type: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">- </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Whether the mapped feature is a fault (fault reaches the ground surface) or a monocline (fault stops below the ground surface but forms a fold in the ground surface).</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">Other technical fields, such accuracy, sense of movement, dip direction, down quadrant, trend</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">and</SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;"> </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;">facing, as well as territorial authority (all Timaru) and buffer distance(all 125 metres) have been removed for simplicity but this information can be found in the Canterbury fault awareness areas 2019 dataset.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Grouping: - </SPAN><SPAN>District Wide Matter</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Sub Group: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">- </SPAN><SPAN>Natural Hazard</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Layer Shape file provided by: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">- </SPAN><SPAN>Helen Jack, Senior Scientist, at Environment Canterbury - ECAN</SPAN></P><P><SPAN STYLE="font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">Date that the Layer was provided: </SPAN><SPAN STYLE="font-weight:bold;">- </SPAN><SPAN>22nd of May 2020</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Service Item Id: f151f2621d7a4f7795c401f40a00475d
Copyright Text: Created by Helen Jack, Environment Canterbury, May 2020, - based on the Canterbury Fault Awareness Area 2019 dataset.
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>Indicating areas to assist in the evaluation of potential future Public Access Provisions - Was Created for the TDC District Plan 2020</SPAN></P><P><SPAN /></P><P><SPAN STYLE="text-decoration:underline;">For any further information please contact</SPAN><SPAN>: - Mark Geddes, Megan Geng or Alex Wakefield from the Planning Unit @ TDC</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>
Description: <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>To assist in the evaluation of potential future Esplanade Strips and Reserves</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>A</SPAN><SPAN>n esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken for one or more of the purposes of s229 of the RMA, including protection of conservation values, provision of public access, or provision of recreational use (that is compatible with the conservation values) when privately owned land is subdivided.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>The taking of an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip when land is subdivided is restricted to allotments which abut the coast, lakes or rivers.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>Where an allotment of less than 4 hectares is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve of 20 metres width will be set aside where the lot adjoins the coast, rivers whose bed width is an average of 3 metres or more, or lakes whose bed is 8 hectares or more in area.</SPAN></P><P><SPAN>However, under s77 of the RMA, a rule in a district plan can alter this presumption so that either no reserve is required, or the width of the reserve is to be greater or less than 20 metres, or an esplanade strip is required instead.</SPAN><SPAN> </SPAN></P><P><SPAN /><SPAN>Where an allotment of 4 hectares or greater is created, the presumption is that an esplanade reserve will not be taken on the allotment. Similarly this presumption can be altered under s77 of the RMA by a rule in a district plan that specifies the circumstances in which an esplanade reserve or esplanade strip can be taken. In this case there is no minimum size of the water body to which the requirements apply.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV>